That boy in the blue sweater is a girl

Out at breakfast the other day with the lil’ monkey, the beloved, and Pops. After an enjoyable meal during which we all agreed with each other about the kidling’s charming precociousness (surprise, surprise!), Pops smiles conspiratorily, gestures with a tip of his head to a neighboring table, leans into me and says, “That boy in the blue sweater is a girl.”

I had noticed her as soon as we’d been seated, as one does when one such as oneself espies the only other mannish woman in a room. Except of course when one is in a dyke bar, in which case one notices the other kinda gals, trying graciously to ignore the mannish women as they constitute the competition. Or at least this is what one used to do, those dozen years ago when one was a swinging single, before one hauled the marlin to end all marlins up onto the deck of life. Said marlin now being the mother of one’s children.

But one digresses.

Regarding the “boy” in the blue sweater, I says back to Pops, “Yep. Just like yours truly.” I smile the broad smile of one who is confident about the positive reception of a long- and hard-fought point. Thank the goddess, by now, nearly twenty years after coming out to him, we have it all figured out. He loves me for who I am; gets it; the works. More or less.

“There’s all kind of genders under the sun, Pops,” sez I.

“Oh?” he said, either feigning confusion to flush me out, or actually expressing it genuinely. We’ve had this chat before. Many times, in fact, and it really helped hone my chops for teaching Women’s Studies 1001 back at “the U,” let me tell you. But nowadays he’s a bit like the lead character Leonard from the movie Memento: short term memory loss up the wazoo. Though I hasten to note that he hasn’t resorted to tatooing vital factoids on his person. Yet. He does, however, keep a list of friends’ and family members’ phone numbers on a tattered little spiral-bound notebook, which he pulls out of his breast pocket from time to time, pencilling over the numbers slowly, deliberately. As if in the penciling he will emboss the numbers and people they represent deep into his long-term memory, for good. Bless his soul.

But so I look at him, and say, “Youbetcha! There are as many shades of gender as there are varieties of apple. Observe.” And I whip out my napkin with a flourish, uncap my pen, and commence to producing the following visual aid:

IMG_5048
Napkinned diagram, let’s call it Fig. A, “The Wacky World O’ Gender, As Depicted Graphically.”

“Hyper-manly mens on the left end of the spectrum,” I explain to him as I sketch, “hecka girly-girls on the right end. Like the Kinsey Scale, people are spread across the whole shebang, more mens being masculine and more womens being feminine, thanks to hormones, but nobody has a lock on either.” His eyes get that far away look, and I imagine he’s contemplating East German women’s dominance at the Olympics during the 1970s.

“If you read fancy gender theorists,” I go on, knowing anything is possible with my dad, “you’d come to consider that masculinity and femininity are best understood as apart from the body, and female masculinity, modern examples of which we see at yon table and here before you, has a long and storied history.”*

Silence from Pops, but maybe because he keeps his hearing aid down low to minimize the reverb. Also, maybe I lost him.

“I, Daddy-O, am right about here,” I say, locating myself as a bit on the manly side of the median point, denoted by MOI in Fig. A.

He nods slowly. After all, he’s known his dolly (moi) ever since his dolly was a cross-dressing tyke, long before she was a swank-dressing dyke. I have him back, and am emboldened to continue.

I then cross-hatch in the range of possibility for males. “And you, I reckon, are riiiiiiiight abouuuuuuuut here.” Punto, down goes the pen just on the girly side of the median. TOI, in Fig. A.

Quiet moment during which he ponders it all.

“Yep, that’s about right,” sez he. He once told a story about how, when he was a young boy, his father explained to him what a “sissy” was. After the lecture was done, my dad thought to himself: “Uh-oh.” Said nothing to his swarthy, strapping, South Dakota farm boy, son of a circuit-riding minister, Coast Survey ship captain dad. Bless his soul.

As we leave the restaurant I catch the gal’s eye, and give her a small smile and a quick single nod, which she returns. Hail fellow, well met. I have to hope my dad found his solidarities along his way. From the tales he’s told, he did. To my enormous gratitude he also found my mother, who loved us both, in spite of our masculinities. Or lack thereof, as the case may be.

* Judith Halberstam’s work Female Masculinity brought this topic book-length treatment; informative review of it here in Jolique; interview with her about it here in Genders. Strap yourself in, though: the interview is jam-packed with 25-cent vocabulary words comprehensible only to advanced, upper division students of genderology. The interviewer’s first question is enough to send the cynic into an anti-intellectual tizzy-fit. Persevere if you dare.

Extra credit reading: George Saunders’ sparklingly brilliant gem of comic satire “My Amendment.”

8 Responses to That boy in the blue sweater is a girl

  1. giddings November 15, 2006 at #

    Several things.
    1. LOVED: “before one hauled the marlin to end all marlins up onto the deck of life. Said marlin now being the mother of one’s children.” And the shift in perspective from the competitive young bucks to the nod of respect. LOVE your writing and description.

    2. I’m an economist, so ALL of this stuff is extra reading to me (I JUST got Halberstam’s book on recommendation from a cultural theorist friend and am quickly flying into that anti-intellectual tizzy fit you describe. I’ll take the dizzying math of econ over those $0.25 words you describe any day. It is sitting NEXT to the much simpler Making Globalization Work by Stiglitz on the bedstand.).

    3. I loved your depiction of the gender continuum. I regularly draw something similar on the white board to my “women in the US economy course” — except I have two “normal curves” (my math background shows through) that overlap in the middle (I expect my students to take my living example of a more masculine woman among all of the scantily-clad college coeds in the room) with the extreme-masculine men and the extreme-feminine women in the opposite tails of the two overlapping curves. This leads to a great economic discussion of ‘women’s jobs’ and ‘mens’ jobs’. . . . Should women be banned from becoming prison guards? Fascinating stuff. Interestingly, the students are either sleeping, or they take the notion of the gender continuum as obvious. As they should (in either case).

    Your dad sounds amazing and your ‘knowing’ him so intimately is a testament. Have you read Alison Bechtel’s new memoir?

  2. Liza November 15, 2006 at #

    Wonderful, wonderful story. You and your dad are lucky, and it sounds like you have a great relationship.

    Back in the day, I used to fancy myself something of a gender theorist, but the link to Genders instantly reminded me why I dropped out of academic grad school instead of law school. My brain still hurts! But the “samish-sex” marriage essay was a treat.

  3. LesbianDad November 15, 2006 at #

    Many, many thanks, LF, on items 1, 2, and 3!

    As to item 2: you know, even if all the cultural theory stuff is intended for Cultural Theorists Only — that is, if it’s published as a university press book, or in an academic journal — I still get a special kind of cranky at the dense thickets of obtusity, seemingly laid out for obtusity’s sake, rather than clarity or precision’s. (had to look up “obtusity”: b-low me down, it’s an actual word!) Of course, I defected from academe, and am now on the outside, so I am the last one to be objective about it all. Economics? Yahooie! Advanced algebra and trig were dizzying to me! BOTH times I took ’em in high school! Hats off to you.

    As to item 3: what a great story. That the Young Peoples in your classes take the notion of the gender continuum as obvious is another of the many signs that give me hope for the future. Thank you, too, for not ridiculing the notoriously humanities-ish liberties I take with the art form of the graph. Of course I love Edward Tufte, but kind of like how I enjoy Nina Simone singing in French or something. A whole lot of it blows by me, but I still think it’s fascinating &/or beautiful and enjoy it nonetheless.

    I have read raves of Alison Bechtel’s memoir, and you’ve now inspired me to up and get it. Thank you for the kind words about my dad. He’s 85 now, and I am keenly aware of the increasing value of the remaining time we have. If it were graphed, it’d be an exponential line for sure.

  4. LesbianDad November 15, 2006 at #

    Thank you, Liza. I figured I was honor-bound to offer up George Saunders as a kind of antidote; glad you liked it. I think it’s the finest example of its genre since Swift’s “A Modest Proposal,” maybe even better.

  5. Trista November 16, 2006 at #

    Great post. Love the humor.

  6. LesbianDad November 16, 2006 at #

    🙂

Trackbacks/Pingbacks

  1. Dateline: Austin, TX | Lesbian Dad - March 12, 2012

    […] can’t fix machines; probably has always felt less masculine than the guy sitting next to him; here’s a post that touches on a bit of that), and this has helped me understand that I am not the only one who might feel like an imposter.  […]

  2. Weekend bonus shot, 06.17.12 | Lesbian Dad - June 18, 2012

    […] me to be a little bit of all of the above.  For him, and his own long journey to becoming (and accepting, in his own way) the man he was, and the example of self-made, off-brand masculinity he has provided me, I am […]

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.