Ever since he turned 80, my sister has thrown our dad a lavish birthday dinner party at her place (our childhood home). She urges him to invite as many close personal friends as he likes. She prepares never less than a four course meal; the first year it was seven.
Exceptions have been made, for a few of the intervening years: eclipsing family events or, thereafter, her living out of the country a bit.
This year she jumped out the gate and celebrated him a month early, since she’ll be in the Phillipines watching a friend get married during Pops’ 88th birthday proper, upcoming in January. Whenever my sister throws a dinner party, no one asks too many questions about the occasion, or its timing. They just ask what time dinner will be served.
Kidcare responsibilities back home meant I couldn’t arrive to be of any help with the food prep, but I was ready to waitron like I never waitron’ed before: this year, Pops’ close personal friends numbered upwards of 23. Fortunately the kitchen/service staff also included my sister’s husband, their son, his chum (son of my sister’s best friend), my sister’s best friend, her husband, and a very gracious Norwegian family member in town for a visit.
I knew Pops had rented a tux for the occasion, and my Norski brother-in-law was wearing one, too. Still I was taken aback when I arrived and I was the only one among us waitstaff without a tie. Or I should say, I was the only non-tie-wearing waitstaffer who was pained by the lack of one. One ten-year-old and one eleven-year-old boy had fine neckties on, and the dashing late-teens Norski family member had on my brother-in-law’s old tux, complete with matching hankie and cumberbund.
My brother-in-law witnessed my distress, and quickly offered to remedy the situation.
“Would you like to borrow a tie? I’ve got plenty.”
It was as if Eric Clapton just offered to loan me one of his guitars. My brother-in-law, after all, is a European man whose work enables him to dress spiffy pretty much all the time. Hell, it requires it from him. The tux he was wearing? His.
“Are you kidding?!” I erupt. “Borrow one of your ties?! Jasureyoubetcha!”
Immediately he turns on his heel, and I follow his brisk pace down the hall toward their room. En route, he gets right down to business. He’s an engineer, after all.
“I have just two questions for you. What color is your suit, and what color are your eyes?”
“Grey, and brown,” I say, pretending as if I knew these questions were coming. Secretly I stash them away with all the other fun info I get from perusing Details magazine waiting for my haircut at the men’s/women’s salon I go to. (Check: match tie not only to suit color but to eye color. Niiiiiice.)
We arrive at the tie drawer, my brother-in-law pulls it open, and over two dozen beautiful ties appear, all neatly rolled up, and lined in rows. He picks out a few promising candidates, splays them out expertly side-by-side, and provides color commentary as to their relative merits and demerits. Finally he pulls one out that’s not too staid, but not so festive as to become giddy, and we’re agreed.
“You European men.”
“What’s that word?” he says. “For being metropolitan, for–”
“You European men invented metrosexuality.”
For fun later that night, when we were catching a bite between courses, he pulled out his white satin breast pocket hankie, shook it a bit, and then showed me how he does it. I was rapt. Hankie treatment has always remained a bit enigmatic to me. A chum over five years ago spent more than a half hour Googling and demonstrating technique (tri-fold? square-topped? multi-flagged? oh my!). This friend should know from au courant: he’s a Baptist preacher. Don’t think he doesn’t put the nat in natty every Sunday morning. The gentleman in Gentleman’s Quarterly. It was a kind of “Baptist preacher eye for the lesbian guy” kind of thing. Effective, but almost overwhelming. After our session I was as much intimidated as enlightened.
My brother-in-law’s current hankie treatment is the finger-draped, center pulled up, base twirled around and folded up under style. Back in the pocket it looks so devil-may-care, so utterly impromptu. But as with all such matters of men’s style, secretly, it’s a fine art.
9 thoughts on “A haberdashery interlude”
You look quite dashing!
Thank you! (At upcoming holiday parties, I’ll shoot for dancing, and prancing, and vixening!)
But it’s all about the right tie choice. Every tie wearer should have a clothes horse Norwegian brother-in-law.
How nice to see you, and not just in silhouette! (Not that you don’t cut a dashing figure in silhouette as well, of course.) And it’s not just the tie, though I’m sure the tie is grand. (I wouldn’t know. I rely on my 22-year-old neighbor to help me pick out my own clothing, and ties are even more beyond my ken.)
It’s a pity that men’s elegant fashions seem to be going the way of the dodo. But then, I have romantic eyes on all the clothing of the 1940s, so I might be a bit biased.
I love it! Love the story, love the tie, love the suit…thanks for the gloomy drizzly Tuesday morning smile 🙂
Yer most welcome. Reno, sister, you are too kind. If your neighbor was a 40-something Norwegian clothes horse, you’d be in good shape.
Hello? Operator? A Ms. Wyle E. Kat please.
Nice photo, great book cover, hues of Hugh.
Which is the bigger thrill? Book cover reference? Or ref. to Mr. Grant? I’m speechless.
Oh, you melt my heart with Cary Grant. He’s the ultimate icon of forties style to me. For the menfolk. And the babafolk. ;-}